<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smile &#8211; You&#8217;re on Camera!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722</link>
	<description>A place to discuss safety-of-flight issues, procedures, techniques, and judgment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 18:04:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSWoodall</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-28270</link>
		<dc:creator>LSWoodall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=722#comment-28270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to have one in my plane if I could use the information to improve my flying.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to have one in my plane if I could use the information to improve my flying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Fred Crawmer</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-28259</link>
		<dc:creator>C Fred Crawmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=722#comment-28259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...first, kill all the lawyers.&quot;   Am all for em particualry if the number of frequent  &amp; huge awards are reduced.  Is very disheartening to read about a perfectly good airplane experiencing either CFIT or has its wings detached during an inadvertent VFR into IMC situation then read about a related award that clearly exceeds the bounds of reason.  These tools may also go a long way in helping to explain the sometimes inexplicable, &quot;Why did the PIC do that?!&quot; and thereby make us all safer, better pilots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;first, kill all the lawyers.&#8221;   Am all for em particualry if the number of frequent  &amp; huge awards are reduced.  Is very disheartening to read about a perfectly good airplane experiencing either CFIT or has its wings detached during an inadvertent VFR into IMC situation then read about a related award that clearly exceeds the bounds of reason.  These tools may also go a long way in helping to explain the sometimes inexplicable, &#8220;Why did the PIC do that?!&#8221; and thereby make us all safer, better pilots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Gaskamp</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-28254</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Gaskamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=722#comment-28254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Howdy just thought  I&#039;d let you know that i&#039;m experiencing problems reading this blog via my iphone so you might want to check on that. thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy just thought  I&#8217;d let you know that i&#8217;m experiencing problems reading this blog via my iphone so you might want to check on that. thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Landsberg</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-28227</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Landsberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=722#comment-28227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John...

Excellent point! I forgot to mention that a number of flight schools and universities use FDLs for exactly that as does FlightSafety and SimCom. They actually video training sessions and the instructors can mark a particular time for a quick review when the sessions are over.

I&#039;ve also heard that some of the new glass panels have memory - trouble is that it often isn&#039;t hardened to survive impact, water or fire. Datalink perhaps in the future?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John&#8230;</p>
<p>Excellent point! I forgot to mention that a number of flight schools and universities use FDLs for exactly that as does FlightSafety and SimCom. They actually video training sessions and the instructors can mark a particular time for a quick review when the sessions are over.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also heard that some of the new glass panels have memory &#8211; trouble is that it often isn&#8217;t hardened to survive impact, water or fire. Datalink perhaps in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lutz</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-28210</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=722#comment-28210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they&#039;re a great idea.

Especially if they help lower the cost of airplanes.  Both in initial cost and in insurance costs.

But, here&#039;s a thought...  maybe they&#039;re not only for accident investigation, but possibly also as a training tool.  The question is directed more toward what kind of data is available, and whether it could easily be downloaded (with appropriate security, of course) to take a look at how accurately you really flew that last approach.

As it is, automobiles already have the recording built in, but they also have a data port to which you can connect to a laptop.  With this, and some helpful software, you can track your performance data, and even &quot;tune&quot; the engine.

If properly secured, why wouldn&#039;t you want to have more information available?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re a great idea.</p>
<p>Especially if they help lower the cost of airplanes.  Both in initial cost and in insurance costs.</p>
<p>But, here&#8217;s a thought&#8230;  maybe they&#8217;re not only for accident investigation, but possibly also as a training tool.  The question is directed more toward what kind of data is available, and whether it could easily be downloaded (with appropriate security, of course) to take a look at how accurately you really flew that last approach.</p>
<p>As it is, automobiles already have the recording built in, but they also have a data port to which you can connect to a laptop.  With this, and some helpful software, you can track your performance data, and even &#8220;tune&#8221; the engine.</p>
<p>If properly secured, why wouldn&#8217;t you want to have more information available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Knoblauch</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=722&#038;cpage=1#comment-28202</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Knoblauch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=722#comment-28202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds like a good idea at first glance, yet it&#039;s not something I&#039;m entirely comfortable with, especially after careful thought.  While the data recorded may be neutral, the interpretation of said data will be biased in some way.  Life experience leads me to believe that it will probably lean towards the &quot;evil&quot; side rather than the &quot;good&quot; simply because that&#039;s where the most money can be made.  Simply put, the people that would be reviewing it have managed to lose my trust over the years and trust is required for such systems to be accepted.

Another observation:  Data recorders are also part of the reason that I&#039;ve continued to hang onto my old cars rather than buy new.  Doesn&#039;t really discourage me from buying a new airplane though, since I can&#039;t afford one anyway!  Wondering if the market in general will buy aircraft because of recorders, or in spite of them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like a good idea at first glance, yet it&#8217;s not something I&#8217;m entirely comfortable with, especially after careful thought.  While the data recorded may be neutral, the interpretation of said data will be biased in some way.  Life experience leads me to believe that it will probably lean towards the &#8220;evil&#8221; side rather than the &#8220;good&#8221; simply because that&#8217;s where the most money can be made.  Simply put, the people that would be reviewing it have managed to lose my trust over the years and trust is required for such systems to be accepted.</p>
<p>Another observation:  Data recorders are also part of the reason that I&#8217;ve continued to hang onto my old cars rather than buy new.  Doesn&#8217;t really discourage me from buying a new airplane though, since I can&#8217;t afford one anyway!  Wondering if the market in general will buy aircraft because of recorders, or in spite of them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
