<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delays and Tar pits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=1232</link>
	<description>A place to discuss safety-of-flight issues, procedures, techniques, and judgment.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:42:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=1232&#038;cpage=1#comment-30115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 21:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=1232#comment-30115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think there are many factors that can lead to delays and concrete acreage is only one of them.  On high x-wind days operations at Newark Liberty (KEWR) on 04-22 R &amp; L are limited to only one runway due to their close proximity, in this case it is not so much the square footage of runway as much as the overall design of the airport that is at the root of the issue.  Clearly two active runways could provide for more volume than one.

That being said, probably the number one reason we hear the command to &quot;Line up and Wait&quot; as opposed to &quot;Cleared for takeoff&quot; is to provide for spacing of airborne aircraft, likewise landing aircraft need to maintain airborne spacing.  I think there is still room to reduce the amount of time spent on the runway and if NextGen can provide for closer spacing in the air, some of that time spent on the runway could be reduced, thus increasing the volume that can be handled by any one runway.  

Still using KEWR as an example, another significant cause for delay is the volume of traffic caused by the mixing of regional with national and international flights.  I would like to see more of the purely regional operations moved to the nearby “regional” airports like Westchester Co (KHPN), MacArthur (KISP), Stewart Intl. (KSWE) and Lehigh Valley Intl. (KABE).  In the end it is really about efficiently moving people and cargo as opposed to overall number of flights and locating the regional operations at regional airports would free up space for more heavies at the major hubs. I also think this model would better serves the long term economic interest of all these airports and their communities.

Just my two cents as both a pilot and airline passenger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are many factors that can lead to delays and concrete acreage is only one of them.  On high x-wind days operations at Newark Liberty (KEWR) on 04-22 R &amp; L are limited to only one runway due to their close proximity, in this case it is not so much the square footage of runway as much as the overall design of the airport that is at the root of the issue.  Clearly two active runways could provide for more volume than one.</p>
<p>That being said, probably the number one reason we hear the command to &#8220;Line up and Wait&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;Cleared for takeoff&#8221; is to provide for spacing of airborne aircraft, likewise landing aircraft need to maintain airborne spacing.  I think there is still room to reduce the amount of time spent on the runway and if NextGen can provide for closer spacing in the air, some of that time spent on the runway could be reduced, thus increasing the volume that can be handled by any one runway.  </p>
<p>Still using KEWR as an example, another significant cause for delay is the volume of traffic caused by the mixing of regional with national and international flights.  I would like to see more of the purely regional operations moved to the nearby “regional” airports like Westchester Co (KHPN), MacArthur (KISP), Stewart Intl. (KSWE) and Lehigh Valley Intl. (KABE).  In the end it is really about efficiently moving people and cargo as opposed to overall number of flights and locating the regional operations at regional airports would free up space for more heavies at the major hubs. I also think this model would better serves the long term economic interest of all these airports and their communities.</p>
<p>Just my two cents as both a pilot and airline passenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Reinhart</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/leadingedge/?p=1232&#038;cpage=1#comment-30082</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reinhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 09:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/asfblog/?p=1232#comment-30082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that concrete, not airspace, is the real limiting factor.  There needs to be more of a push to get traffic out hubs to other airports in the area.  The prime example around here is Worcester Regional Airport (KORH).  A towered airport that lost its commercial service after a fancy new terminal was built.  Since then there have been several abortive attempts to restore service, none of which have succeeded long-term.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that concrete, not airspace, is the real limiting factor.  There needs to be more of a push to get traffic out hubs to other airports in the area.  The prime example around here is Worcester Regional Airport (KORH).  A towered airport that lost its commercial service after a fancy new terminal was built.  Since then there have been several abortive attempts to restore service, none of which have succeeded long-term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
