<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colorful characters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?feed=rss2&#038;p=77" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77</link>
	<description>AOPA's Helicopter Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:56:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: outlaw63446</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>outlaw63446</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 12:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How about a nice &quot;FAA horror story blog&quot;? There certainly is enough material out there. My neighbors objected to having to listen to me landing my float  equipped helicopter on the lake (internaltional waterway). So they filed a complaint with the FAA, who were only too happy to charge me with reckless operation. The &quot;investigation&quot; was based on two photos supplied by the neighbors - one supposedly showing me near a swimming area, with the rotors stopped and turbine not runnng, and another with me taxiing on tha water 300 feet from shore. They simply sent me a letter and told me that my license was suspended for 6 months. The guys that flew through the Washington, D.C. prohibited airspace in the Cessna lost their licenses for 90 days. FAA justice. Anyway, I coperated in the process, and was told that the suspension would be upheld. At that point, I decided that having to listen to, or see a helicopter was not reckless, and told them that I was ready for my hearing. They dropped the case. NEVER trust an FAA guy. Keep your guard up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a nice &#8220;FAA horror story blog&#8221;? There certainly is enough material out there. My neighbors objected to having to listen to me landing my float  equipped helicopter on the lake (internaltional waterway). So they filed a complaint with the FAA, who were only too happy to charge me with reckless operation. The &#8220;investigation&#8221; was based on two photos supplied by the neighbors &#8211; one supposedly showing me near a swimming area, with the rotors stopped and turbine not runnng, and another with me taxiing on tha water 300 feet from shore. They simply sent me a letter and told me that my license was suspended for 6 months. The guys that flew through the Washington, D.C. prohibited airspace in the Cessna lost their licenses for 90 days. FAA justice. Anyway, I coperated in the process, and was told that the suspension would be upheld. At that point, I decided that having to listen to, or see a helicopter was not reckless, and told them that I was ready for my hearing. They dropped the case. NEVER trust an FAA guy. Keep your guard up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Neville</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>B Neville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And provided by Avi! Thank you, kind sir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And provided by Avi! Thank you, kind sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B Neville</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>B Neville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You will be interested to learn that we will soon (probably this month) have at least four additional online courses on FAASafety.gov, and they are all helicopter courses!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will be interested to learn that we will soon (probably this month) have at least four additional online courses on FAASafety.gov, and they are all helicopter courses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Airwolf2000</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Airwolf2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 23:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for a place for  helo people  within AOPA.If you want to see an accident waiting to happen watch Rand R aviation  on Axe Men/ History Channel  on television.If all the things they portray are &quot;real&quot; it wont be long  before  they have an  accident.Its a  shame because it puts good safe helo pilots in a bad  light.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a place for  helo people  within AOPA.If you want to see an accident waiting to happen watch Rand R aviation  on Axe Men/ History Channel  on television.If all the things they portray are &#8220;real&#8221; it wont be long  before  they have an  accident.Its a  shame because it puts good safe helo pilots in a bad  light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule Number 1 - The media is ALWAYS wrong!
Rule Number 2 - If you decide to get some action, while in action, TURN OFF THE CAMERA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule Number 1 &#8211; The media is ALWAYS wrong!<br />
Rule Number 2 &#8211; If you decide to get some action, while in action, TURN OFF THE CAMERA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chopper dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>chopper dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that I am a member but it seams to me that the mile high club has been around for years. They even sell pins I&#039;m told. I&#039;m not an avocate of harrasing neighbors and landing on public streets without permission though but I have heard of way too many airplane pilots that have partaken in such activities while only the auto pilot was flying the plane. At least this guy was at the controls or was she?? LOL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I am a member but it seams to me that the mile high club has been around for years. They even sell pins I&#8217;m told. I&#8217;m not an avocate of harrasing neighbors and landing on public streets without permission though but I have heard of way too many airplane pilots that have partaken in such activities while only the auto pilot was flying the plane. At least this guy was at the controls or was she?? LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capt. Denis Murphy</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt. Denis Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enought of this!!!!!!!! The government is putting too much on this helicopter pilot. This sounds and smells like the thing that happened to Bob Hoover. I believe too much government control is getting out of hand!!!!!!!  He is PIC of the helicopter, is his butt setting on the machine , so if something happens , he will be responsible for that. He has insurance!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enought of this!!!!!!!! The government is putting too much on this helicopter pilot. This sounds and smells like the thing that happened to Bob Hoover. I believe too much government control is getting out of hand!!!!!!!  He is PIC of the helicopter, is his butt setting on the machine , so if something happens , he will be responsible for that. He has insurance!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Kovnat</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Kovnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Avi writes:

&gt;Now … how about a nice discussion on the benefits and drawbacks of a fully-articulated rotor system?  

&gt;-avi

From what I understand, if your particular needs can be met by a main rotor with two blades instead of three or more, than the &quot;teeter totter&quot; configuration may well meet your needs. That configuration was criticized at one time because of the problem of mast bumping. Still, the teeter totter configuration offers the advantage of simplicity, i.e. no need for flapping or lead-lag hinges. 

But If your needs require a main rotor with three or more blades, what is the norm today on civilian helicopters other than full articulation, i.e. pitch hinge, flapping hinge and lead-lag hinge for each blade? 

I remember years ago an assault helicopter developed by Lockheed, the Cheyenne, had a rigid rotor system. But that machine was never put into production. Should it have been, and was its rotor system something a civilian helicopter pilot might like to have? Now, that would be an interesting discussion! 

Of course I suppose some pilots will then get into trouble flying a helicopter so equipped, through a loop while a girl is doing stuff with him :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avi writes:</p>
<p>&gt;Now … how about a nice discussion on the benefits and drawbacks of a fully-articulated rotor system?  </p>
<p>&gt;-avi</p>
<p>From what I understand, if your particular needs can be met by a main rotor with two blades instead of three or more, than the &#8220;teeter totter&#8221; configuration may well meet your needs. That configuration was criticized at one time because of the problem of mast bumping. Still, the teeter totter configuration offers the advantage of simplicity, i.e. no need for flapping or lead-lag hinges. </p>
<p>But If your needs require a main rotor with three or more blades, what is the norm today on civilian helicopters other than full articulation, i.e. pitch hinge, flapping hinge and lead-lag hinge for each blade? </p>
<p>I remember years ago an assault helicopter developed by Lockheed, the Cheyenne, had a rigid rotor system. But that machine was never put into production. Should it have been, and was its rotor system something a civilian helicopter pilot might like to have? Now, that would be an interesting discussion! </p>
<p>Of course I suppose some pilots will then get into trouble flying a helicopter so equipped, through a loop while a girl is doing stuff with him <img src='http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Helicopters are fun and open the doors to many opportunities.  It is too bad there are people who are so envious and spiteful that they have to distort the truth to add un needed drama.

Lisa]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Helicopters are fun and open the doors to many opportunities.  It is too bad there are people who are so envious and spiteful that they have to distort the truth to add un needed drama.</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Martz</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>David Martz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=77#comment-111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi  Tim

First of all you need to get the facts staright.  You can not rely on media to get the facts.  Based on what you wrote I would expect the responses you and other blogs have received. Why not just interview me.

I have never landed at Tommy Lee&#039;s house, and WAS NOT charged with reckless flying. In fact after the FAA investigated they found nothing wrong and sent me a letter closing the case.

I was never ordered out of the sky by the LAPD (how do you do that anyway) There was no eratic flying, I would never disobey instructions from a tower (unless there was an emergency which warranted it) and we never went to a bar and started drinking. 

While being pleasured by a female I was in complete control and could have handled any emergency.  It has, and always will be safety first for me.  And by the way the act of pleasure occurred in May of 2005.  Almost 4 years ago.  I cherish life more than anyone and would never put myself or others in harms way.

All of the pilots out there who have been pleaseured while flying should be thinking what the heck is the FAA going to impose nex?.  A new FAR which will not allow us to drink coffee in the cockpit for fear we may spill it in our lap? 

It would be nice to have fellow pilots who know the facts and know my flying capabilities to help me get my license back.  This has turned into a National Circus.  To have one&#039;s license revoked because he received oral sex while flying is unbelievable.  Watch the video,  what part of the flight was careless and reckless.  You fellow helicopter pilots know that in the event of an engine failure the first thing we do is lower the collective.  


David Martz]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi  Tim</p>
<p>First of all you need to get the facts staright.  You can not rely on media to get the facts.  Based on what you wrote I would expect the responses you and other blogs have received. Why not just interview me.</p>
<p>I have never landed at Tommy Lee&#8217;s house, and WAS NOT charged with reckless flying. In fact after the FAA investigated they found nothing wrong and sent me a letter closing the case.</p>
<p>I was never ordered out of the sky by the LAPD (how do you do that anyway) There was no eratic flying, I would never disobey instructions from a tower (unless there was an emergency which warranted it) and we never went to a bar and started drinking. </p>
<p>While being pleasured by a female I was in complete control and could have handled any emergency.  It has, and always will be safety first for me.  And by the way the act of pleasure occurred in May of 2005.  Almost 4 years ago.  I cherish life more than anyone and would never put myself or others in harms way.</p>
<p>All of the pilots out there who have been pleaseured while flying should be thinking what the heck is the FAA going to impose nex?.  A new FAR which will not allow us to drink coffee in the cockpit for fear we may spill it in our lap? </p>
<p>It would be nice to have fellow pilots who know the facts and know my flying capabilities to help me get my license back.  This has turned into a National Circus.  To have one&#8217;s license revoked because he received oral sex while flying is unbelievable.  Watch the video,  what part of the flight was careless and reckless.  You fellow helicopter pilots know that in the event of an engine failure the first thing we do is lower the collective.  </p>
<p>David Martz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
