<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paint jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?feed=rss2&#038;p=531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531</link>
	<description>AOPA's Helicopter Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wind power</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>wind power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-2494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Awesome things here. I am very glad to peer your article.
Thank you a lot and I&#039;m taking a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome things here. I am very glad to peer your article.<br />
Thank you a lot and I&#8217;m taking a look ahead to contact you. Will you please drop me a e-mail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehud Gavron</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1414</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehud Gavron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 20:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tim - it would be great if you or your knowledgeable readers could do an article on &quot;stealth helicopters.&quot;  The media is going nuts repeating these claims.  They&#039;re also confused about a SH-60 vs an MH-60 (or UH-60).   

Eurocopter main-rotor blades that reduce sound by 3-4dB (50%): http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/silent-rotor-blades-could-lead-to-true-stealth-helicopters/4663

Sikorski/Boeing RAH-66 Comanche with ducted fantail and stealth bodywork: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing/Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche

And finally the real &quot;whisper-mode&quot; helicopters: AIrwolf and Blue Thunder.

E]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; it would be great if you or your knowledgeable readers could do an article on &#8220;stealth helicopters.&#8221;  The media is going nuts repeating these claims.  They&#8217;re also confused about a SH-60 vs an MH-60 (or UH-60).   </p>
<p>Eurocopter main-rotor blades that reduce sound by 3-4dB (50%): <a href="http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/silent-rotor-blades-could-lead-to-true-stealth-helicopters/4663" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/silent-rotor-blades-could-lead-to-true-stealth-helicopters/4663</a></p>
<p>Sikorski/Boeing RAH-66 Comanche with ducted fantail and stealth bodywork: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing/Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing/Sikorsky_RAH-66_Comanche</a></p>
<p>And finally the real &#8220;whisper-mode&#8221; helicopters: AIrwolf and Blue Thunder.</p>
<p>E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehud Gavron</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehud Gavron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 15:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[I&#039;m tempted to say nothing because this is more political than helicopter.  However, I&#039;m also tempted to say that there would be MORE helicopters, MORE job opportunities, and MORE money in the helicopter industry if these issues were corrected.]

It is always sweet to say &quot;Reduce the huge Executive bonuses.&quot;  Those are usually part of those same executives&#039; contracts.  They (the executives) are paid to provide results.  Their shareholders -- as these are public corporations -- expect increased profits.  Manufacturing in countries that don&#039;t have unions, OSHA, and three letter agencies starting with F is more profitable.  The South Park episode where the people say &quot;They Took Our Jobs&quot;, while humorous, and while &quot;demanding&quot; that &quot;they&quot; &quot;give us our jobs back&quot; doesn&#039;t address the real issue.  

WHO is it that should &quot;reduce&quot; those bonuses?  They are contracted.  WHO should negotiate contracts that pays those executives less?  Usually it&#039;s a board of directors.  IF they somehow did this, would they then have a larger profit, higher distributions to shareholders (either through dividends or reinvestment) or would they decided to FORGO those profits, and put their manufacturing plant somewhere that regulatorily is a hellhole.   I suspect the former.

If you would like there to be more &quot;Made In Merka&quot; stuff (and I would), the way to get it is to remove all of the barriers standing in the way for companies to do so profitably.  Sadly the unions and the insurance lobby have made it difficult to impossible.  Any sufficiently large company &quot;outsources&quot;.  That&#039;s a nice way of saying &quot;we can get it done much more profitably elsewhere.&quot;  I learned yesterday that if I buy a new Dell laptop, I can pay $100 extra (per year) for &quot;North American support.&quot;  Otherwise it&#039;s outsourced.  Would you pay $2M for a $1.5M helicopter because it was made in the US?  Would you do so with taxpayer money (LEP, Armed Forces, etc.) or would you do so with your own personal money?  I would rather save the $500,000.00.


It&#039;s nice that Bell Textron does some manufacturing in Merka.  Most of that... however... is in Canada.  The United States&#039; current regulatory and union stance are staunchly anti-success.  

Best regards,  

E]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[I'm tempted to say nothing because this is more political than helicopter.  However, I'm also tempted to say that there would be MORE helicopters, MORE job opportunities, and MORE money in the helicopter industry if these issues were corrected.]</p>
<p>It is always sweet to say &#8220;Reduce the huge Executive bonuses.&#8221;  Those are usually part of those same executives&#8217; contracts.  They (the executives) are paid to provide results.  Their shareholders &#8212; as these are public corporations &#8212; expect increased profits.  Manufacturing in countries that don&#8217;t have unions, OSHA, and three letter agencies starting with F is more profitable.  The South Park episode where the people say &#8220;They Took Our Jobs&#8221;, while humorous, and while &#8220;demanding&#8221; that &#8220;they&#8221; &#8220;give us our jobs back&#8221; doesn&#8217;t address the real issue.  </p>
<p>WHO is it that should &#8220;reduce&#8221; those bonuses?  They are contracted.  WHO should negotiate contracts that pays those executives less?  Usually it&#8217;s a board of directors.  IF they somehow did this, would they then have a larger profit, higher distributions to shareholders (either through dividends or reinvestment) or would they decided to FORGO those profits, and put their manufacturing plant somewhere that regulatorily is a hellhole.   I suspect the former.</p>
<p>If you would like there to be more &#8220;Made In Merka&#8221; stuff (and I would), the way to get it is to remove all of the barriers standing in the way for companies to do so profitably.  Sadly the unions and the insurance lobby have made it difficult to impossible.  Any sufficiently large company &#8220;outsources&#8221;.  That&#8217;s a nice way of saying &#8220;we can get it done much more profitably elsewhere.&#8221;  I learned yesterday that if I buy a new Dell laptop, I can pay $100 extra (per year) for &#8220;North American support.&#8221;  Otherwise it&#8217;s outsourced.  Would you pay $2M for a $1.5M helicopter because it was made in the US?  Would you do so with taxpayer money (LEP, Armed Forces, etc.) or would you do so with your own personal money?  I would rather save the $500,000.00.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice that Bell Textron does some manufacturing in Merka.  Most of that&#8230; however&#8230; is in Canada.  The United States&#8217; current regulatory and union stance are staunchly anti-success.  </p>
<p>Best regards,  </p>
<p>E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr X</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1412</link>
		<dc:creator>mr X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 13:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doesn&#039;t anyone find it ironic that the manufacturer flying the &quot;patriotic paintjob&quot; isn&#039;t American?

Re-packaging Aerospatiale as &quot;American Eurocopter&quot; or any of the other manufacturing outsourcing gimmicks can&#039;t be covered up with a pretty paintjob- It&#039;s a total whitewash.

Reduce the huge Executive bonuses, pay the American worker a living wage, and build aircraft here in America!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t anyone find it ironic that the manufacturer flying the &#8220;patriotic paintjob&#8221; isn&#8217;t American?</p>
<p>Re-packaging Aerospatiale as &#8220;American Eurocopter&#8221; or any of the other manufacturing outsourcing gimmicks can&#8217;t be covered up with a pretty paintjob- It&#8217;s a total whitewash.</p>
<p>Reduce the huge Executive bonuses, pay the American worker a living wage, and build aircraft here in America!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. L. Whittington</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>E. L. Whittington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow brings back memories of 1969 and the movie EASY RIDER.  Lets see, how can u compare a Harley chopper to a helicopter...neither one have an ejection seat...and under varying circumstances they&#039;re both likely candidates  to take ground fire.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow brings back memories of 1969 and the movie EASY RIDER.  Lets see, how can u compare a Harley chopper to a helicopter&#8230;neither one have an ejection seat&#8230;and under varying circumstances they&#8217;re both likely candidates  to take ground fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Neubecker</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1410</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Neubecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget Santani Air!  In the mid-80&#039;s TV series &quot;Airwolf&quot; Dominic Santani&#039;s Jet Rangers, and his Jeep all had the Stars and Stripes paint scheme.  That was the first time I ever saw an aircraft painted like the American flag.  As a boy growing up, that show also inspired me to become a helicopter pilot.  It is also kind of ironic that those Eurocopters are painted with that paint scheme--wouldn&#039;t that be like a French car painted with an American flag?  Ha, ha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget Santani Air!  In the mid-80&#8242;s TV series &#8220;Airwolf&#8221; Dominic Santani&#8217;s Jet Rangers, and his Jeep all had the Stars and Stripes paint scheme.  That was the first time I ever saw an aircraft painted like the American flag.  As a boy growing up, that show also inspired me to become a helicopter pilot.  It is also kind of ironic that those Eurocopters are painted with that paint scheme&#8211;wouldn&#8217;t that be like a French car painted with an American flag?  Ha, ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Dugger</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Dugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is nice to see a patriotic display. With many it seems to have fallen out of favor and that is sad.

I fly the flag everyday and get many positive comments.
I would encourage others that are sitting on the fence to spend the money on a decent flag pole and flag and enjoy the sound of it snapping in the wind.

God bless America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nice to see a patriotic display. With many it seems to have fallen out of favor and that is sad.</p>
<p>I fly the flag everyday and get many positive comments.<br />
I would encourage others that are sitting on the fence to spend the money on a decent flag pole and flag and enjoy the sound of it snapping in the wind.</p>
<p>God bless America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Peffer</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Peffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Painting / art are disciplines that go back thousands of year. I think these treasurers are right up there with the American Bald Eagle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Painting / art are disciplines that go back thousands of year. I think these treasurers are right up there with the American Bald Eagle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehud Gavron</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehud Gavron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=531#comment-1407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is very cool to take a beautiful work of mechanical art (a helicopter) and turn it into a thing of beauty any lay-person can enjoy :)   While clothing is not allowed as a method of displaying the US flag (US Flag Code §176), the use on a helicopter is not prohibited.

Thanks for the cool pictures... it&#039;s unusual for controllers to even SEE a helicopter let alone comment on it.  Great story!

Ehud Gavron
Tucson AZ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very cool to take a beautiful work of mechanical art (a helicopter) and turn it into a thing of beauty any lay-person can enjoy <img src='http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />    While clothing is not allowed as a method of displaying the US flag (US Flag Code §176), the use on a helicopter is not prohibited.</p>
<p>Thanks for the cool pictures&#8230; it&#8217;s unusual for controllers to even SEE a helicopter let alone comment on it.  Great story!</p>
<p>Ehud Gavron<br />
Tucson AZ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
