<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wheels or skids?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?feed=rss2&#038;p=504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504</link>
	<description>AOPA's Helicopter Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Pearce</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 19:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-2141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pre-dating the Cobra heli, in the early 70&#039;s, the Army built some special SOTAS versions of the Huey.  They had retractable skids to allow a large belly mounted antenna to rotate to detect enemy targets.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pre-dating the Cobra heli, in the early 70&#8242;s, the Army built some special SOTAS versions of the Huey.  They had retractable skids to allow a large belly mounted antenna to rotate to detect enemy targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they left out one major thing about wheels - ground resonance. They are more susceptible than skids. But that 430 sure looks gorgeous with wheels!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they left out one major thing about wheels &#8211; ground resonance. They are more susceptible than skids. But that 430 sure looks gorgeous with wheels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Borkhuis</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Borkhuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 01:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget about bearpaws that get added to skids for landing on soft fields and/or snow.

As for running landings on skids, depending on wind, you can have very little run if you do it right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about bearpaws that get added to skids for landing on soft fields and/or snow.</p>
<p>As for running landings on skids, depending on wind, you can have very little run if you do it right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim hanson</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>jim hanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve owned a Bell 47, Hughes 300, and currently an Enstrom.  I flew a McCullogh certified gyroplane a few times, and ever since, have wished for wheels on the helicopter.  As previously mentioned, run-on landings are never a problem--or autos, for that matter.  Landings couldn&#039;t be easier--a flare like an airplane and a 50&#039; (or less) fun-on delivers smooth and predictable landings.  You always retain the option of a hover landing, but watching wheeled helicopters do hover landings--they usually aren&#039;t as smooth.

I know the Bell 47 originally had a 4-wheel gear.  It would also make sense for a multiple-blade rotor system--mitigating the chance of  ground resonance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve owned a Bell 47, Hughes 300, and currently an Enstrom.  I flew a McCullogh certified gyroplane a few times, and ever since, have wished for wheels on the helicopter.  As previously mentioned, run-on landings are never a problem&#8211;or autos, for that matter.  Landings couldn&#8217;t be easier&#8211;a flare like an airplane and a 50&#8242; (or less) fun-on delivers smooth and predictable landings.  You always retain the option of a hover landing, but watching wheeled helicopters do hover landings&#8211;they usually aren&#8217;t as smooth.</p>
<p>I know the Bell 47 originally had a 4-wheel gear.  It would also make sense for a multiple-blade rotor system&#8211;mitigating the chance of  ground resonance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to Float equipped helicopters there are also a small number of models that have amphibious hulls with retractable wheels which can alight on water and also land on land.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to Float equipped helicopters there are also a small number of models that have amphibious hulls with retractable wheels which can alight on water and also land on land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You omitted FLOAT equiped helicopters. A varient of &quot;skids&quot; on land but with the added availability of alighting on water.
Floats can be fixed for everyday use or emergency deployable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You omitted FLOAT equiped helicopters. A varient of &#8220;skids&#8221; on land but with the added availability of alighting on water.<br />
Floats can be fixed for everyday use or emergency deployable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdxpilot</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1378</link>
		<dc:creator>pdxpilot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good things - I think the A109 looks like an Italian sports car with the wheels retracted - but the A119 loses something with skids.  But then there are sleek looking skids like on EC120/EC130 - so sleek they can be protected as intellectual property.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good things &#8211; I think the A109 looks like an Italian sports car with the wheels retracted &#8211; but the A119 loses something with skids.  But then there are sleek looking skids like on EC120/EC130 &#8211; so sleek they can be protected as intellectual property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stark</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Running take-off and landing operations (which are helpful when power limited, as from high density altitude) are much more practical and pleasant with wheels rolling than with skids scraping.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Running take-off and landing operations (which are helpful when power limited, as from high density altitude) are much more practical and pleasant with wheels rolling than with skids scraping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ehud Gavron</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1373</link>
		<dc:creator>Ehud Gavron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Skid gear is always fixed 

The original Bell 209 (Cobra AH-1G) had retractable skids.  These were replaced by fixed skids in the production variants.

Googling &quot;cobra retractable skids&quot; finds lots of resources. One such: http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea015_Cobra_Snow/00.shtm

Ehud]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Skid gear is always fixed </p>
<p>The original Bell 209 (Cobra AH-1G) had retractable skids.  These were replaced by fixed skids in the production variants.</p>
<p>Googling &#8220;cobra retractable skids&#8221; finds lots of resources. One such: <a href="http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea015_Cobra_Snow/00.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aircraftresourcecenter.com/Fea1/001-100/Fea015_Cobra_Snow/00.shtm</a></p>
<p>Ehud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Ahlen</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Ahlen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/helicopter/?p=504#comment-1372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You left out the third possibility.  Wheels that are NOT retractable.  I feel they are the best of both worlds.  Heavier than skids, lighter than the associated added weight of hydraulics to retract them.  Sure more drag, but you can&#039;t forget to put them down!  In the H-60 series we have MORE than enough torque to hit 160 Kts in level flight with them down.  Many military helicopters use this config and it is a great &quot;compromise&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left out the third possibility.  Wheels that are NOT retractable.  I feel they are the best of both worlds.  Heavier than skids, lighter than the associated added weight of hydraulics to retract them.  Sure more drag, but you can&#8217;t forget to put them down!  In the H-60 series we have MORE than enough torque to hit 160 Kts in level flight with them down.  Many military helicopters use this config and it is a great &#8220;compromise&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
