Archive for the ‘Training advice’ Category

Fear of a lost logbook

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2011

I don’t often use this space to plug other blogs (the boss likes us to write our own, for some reason), but this one is too good not to share with the training and wannabe-professional audience. Adam Fast takes a really good look at something we all know is possible but fervently hope will never happen to us: losing a logbook.

Using a friend’s mishap as a cautionary tale, Fast explains that the worst part of losing a logbook (or a medical certificate) is the fact that without that documentation, the evidence of all those hard-earned and expensive flight hours evaporates. And he points out that not only do you have to worry about misplacing these documents, you also have to worry about theft or fire or other natural disaster that could render your documents null and void.

Being a self-professed geek, Adam carefully examines options you can take to back up your records. Think you’re good because you use an online logbook? Think again, and take Adam’s advice because hey, he does this stuff for a living. And now if you’ll excuse me, I have some photocopying to do.

How do you protect your logbook? Please tell us in the Comments section.–Jill W. Tallman

Everyone knows it’s windy

Thursday, October 20th, 2011
As a pre-solo student, I turned up at the airport one morning for a lesson on a day that was a bit windy. I don’t recall what the winds were, but they were probably above 10 knots. My instructor took a look at the winds and canceled our flight. “You wouldn’t learn anything,” he said.
What he meant was that the newish sensations of an airplane moving around in reaction to strong, gusty winds would be daunting for a pre-solo student, and he was absolutely right. I’d likely have spent the entire lesson reacting to and then overcorrecting the movements of the airplane, and wouldn’t have retained anything we were trying to accomplish. He did me and my wallet a favor that day. We spent the hour in ground school.
Later, of course, as I got a few more hours under my belt, we launched in breezy conditions. Even then–even though I knew what to expect, because we’d briefed it–I felt unprepared for the way the airplane seemed to rock and roll without control inputs from me. It was unnerving and uncomfortable. It was a little scary.
 
I asked a colleague–a CFI–if it was normal to feel this way, or was I being a baby? She could have laughed, but she didn’t. She took the question seriously and told me to think about the airplane as if it were a boat, reacting to the movement of the water that surrounds it. This helped–a little. Hours of flight time and more exposure to winds helped too.
If we wait until it’s absolutely calm to fly every flight, we’ll stay on the ground a lot. Pilots who live in Oklahoma and Texas, where the winds seem to be a fact of life, get acclimated to them very quickly. Others may not. I’ve seen many new pilots confess they’re still uncomfortable with the way the airplane feels when it bobs around. Are they being babies? No, but when the discomfort remains and starts to interfere with the learning process, that’s when you need an intervention.
If something’s bothering you in the cockpit, don’t let it get the better of you. Tell your CFI, or a pilot friend, and get a second point of view. Schedule a flight lesson to tackle that particular issue. If the fear and anxiety start to outweigh the reward, and we don’t do anything about it, we might be tempted to give it up. And that would be a shame. There are nice days ahead, beautiful days just beckoning you to take to the sky. Don’t let a little wind stop you from enjoying them.–Jill Tallman

The gospel, according to Jobs

Thursday, October 13th, 2011

Of the many eulogies that have come out since Apple co-founder Steve Jobs’ death last week, perhaps none is better than his own. At a 2005 commencement speech to graduates of Stanford University, Jobs told three stories, the events of which came to shape his life and beliefs.

The final story centered around Jobs’ battle with cancer. He said that when he was young he read a line that said something like, “If you live each day as if it was your last, someday you’ll most certainly be right.” From that point on, Jobs said he looked in the mirror every day and asked himself if he wanted to do what he was about to do that day. If the answer was no too many days in a row, he changed.

Although Jobs’ story came from a somewhat fatalistic point of view, I think his message was incredibly poignant, and surprisingly relatable to flight training. The research on flight training that AOPA conducted about a year ago framed the ideal flight training experience. A series of major themes emerged, not the least of which was that the instructor is the key factor in flight training. This isn’t particularly surprising, but the level to which it was reinforced was.

It became crystal clear from the focus groups and extensive survey that a good instructor gets students through the process with ease, while a poor instructor does not. Other contributing factors included the performance of the flight school, training value, and how engaged in the aviation community the student is. But ultimately, it all boils down to the flight instructor.

Another thing that was readily apparent from the research is that the majority of people learn to fly for recreation. They have a friend who flies, they  are fulfilling a childhood dream, or they think taking an airplane on vacation would be a good time.

That’s important because it says to me we can emulate Jobs easily by simply asking ourselves if we are having fun. Do you still enjoy going to the airport? Do you enjoy reading about flight? Do you feel good  after a lesson, especially after paying the bill? Does all of this training seem worth it to you? If you look in the mirror before every lesson, and you don’t want to do (or spend) what you’re about to do, don’t quit training–quit your instructor or school. Thousands of pilots have great training experiences where they enjoy virtually every minute of the process, and come out the other end with a certificate and a smile. You can too. But you need to make sure you are learning in the right place and with the right person.

There’s no question it’s hard to “fire” someone who may be nice and honest, but who just doesn’t mesh with you. But here’s the secret: A professional instructor will likely agree with your decision. Instructors worth their salt know that a proper CFI/student match is vital, and they should willingly give up a student if it’s not working. Because a good instructor’s goal is to get you to the finish line, not pad his or her logbook.

Remember, this is supposed to be fun, and a means to an end. It will be worth it.

–Ian J. Twombly

Boy, that was dumb

Monday, October 10th, 2011

In most aspects of life, we often learn by experience, and often the best teachers are dumb decisions or dumb mistakes. You learn the hard way not to rub your eyes with soap on your hands, or not to bite into a slice of pizza straight out of the oven. In flying, you may learn the hard way to verify that you really did untie the airplane before leaving the parking spot. If not, the rest of us will enjoy laughing not with you, but most assuredly at you. Did you forget to switch tanks in your Cherokee? The silence you soon will hear will guarantee you that you will not make that mistake again.

I’d like to use this post to hear from you, the readers. I will admit that I have done a few dumb things that will remain my knowledge alone (none of the above were mine). Unfortunately, I don’t what the statute of limitations is on a few of my mistakes (translated: I am a bit embarrassed by them), but I will admit to one that goes back to my student pilot days. I could make a strong argument that I had some implicit help in this one, but I will also take responsibility for it as well.

When I was ready for my long solo cross-country (the rules were different then), I was told to plan a flight from Bay Bridge Airport to Charlottesville, Virginia (CHO), to Williamsburg/Jamestown and return. The easiest leg was clearly going to be the one from Jamestown back to Bay Bridge. All I had to do was follow the Chesapeake Bay. It was so simple a blind man could have done it. It’s also the only part that went according to plan.

The problem with Charlottesville is that the airport was at the very bottom corner of the sectional. The arrival from the north was supposed to be made easier by a rather unique-looking lake, whose shape (I was told by my instructor) would make it nearly impossible to miss. Key word: nearly. It never even dawned on me to take the adjacent sectional…and nobody suggested to me that I should. I mean, just because one has a road map of Ohio in the car does not mean that one needs a road map of, say, Pennsylvania. Right? Right?? Right!

So, on the (hazy, summer) day in question, I got down to the CHO area with no problem. But the lake on the ground…well, it was blue. But I could not convince myself that it was the lake I wanted. As I looked at the sectional and the ground, I began to suspect that something wasn’t right. I also realized that I had to be very careful about not flying off the sectional, or I’d be an airborne Christopher Columbus, with no idea of what was out in front of me, and unlike Chris, I didn’t have an extra three days with which to work. To make what could be a very long story short, I called Flight Service, and with their help (and with me being asked to squawk 7700), I came to realize that I was right where I needed to be. In retrospect, it was obvious I should have had the Cincinnati sectional in addition to the Washington chart, and in this case, I should have trusted my instincts. But I did trust in and use my training in getting resituated. Ironically enough, CHO soon became one of my favorite airports to visit, both via general aviation and with the airlines. Go figure.

So, what’s your story?–Chip Wright

There’s a reason that ‘C’ stands for ‘confess’

Thursday, October 6th, 2011

A student pilot on Twitter sent me a private message recently to tell me he’d completed his solo cross-country. At the end of his Tweet, he said, “I got lost for about 10 minutes but I made the loop.”

Boy, did that trigger memories! I got lost on my long solo cross-country. I’m not sure whether it was 10 minutes or 20, because once I realized that I was not where I thought I should be and wasn’t sure exactly where I was, I didn’t let things distintegrate any further. I swallowed my pride and called on ATC for help.

This happened in the weeks following September 11, 2001, after student pilots were permitted to return to the air. Prohibited Area P-40, which covers Camp David, had been widened from its usual five nautical miles to 10, and remained that way for awhile, as I recall.

The first leg, from Frederick Municipal to Lancaster, went fine (unless you count the dry mouth and shaky knees). The second leg, from Lancaster to Hagerstown Regional, was where things fell apart somewhat. Trundling along in the Socata TB9, I began to get nervous when I didn’t spy York airport, one of my checkpoints.

That second leg was to was to take me north of expanded P-40, skirting the prohibited area by a generous margin, and then to Hagerstown. As I started looking at my sectional and checking my course heading, images of F-16s pulling up alongside the Tampico flooded my brain. As I saw it, there was a distinct problem with continuing on my present course and hoping for the best. For all I knew, I was headed directly into P-40.

After a couple more minutes of trying to find something recognizable on the chart, I keyed the mike and called the Hagerstown tower. A controller listened to my concern, gave me a transponder code, and when she had me on radar provided vectors to the airport. Simple as that. I think she said something like “good job” when I landed. I was so grateful for her kind treatment of a worried-verging-on-scared student pilot that I called the next day to thank her. The leg back to Frederick went without a hitch.

Moral of the story? Controllers are there to help all of us. Second moral of the story? Don’t wait to ask for help. Painting yourself into a corner will only limit your options, or the controller’s, when at last you see the light.–Jill W. Tallman

The simulator

Tuesday, October 4th, 2011

Simulator training is the backbone of airline and biz jet training. Early Link trainers worked by allowing a student to learn how to navigate solely by reference to the instruments. Half the battle was not getting sick. The basic procedures of instrument flight could be trained, learned, and understood, but little about the Link was airplane-model specific.

These days, some simulators cost more than the airplanes they represent, and the degree of realism is uncanny. The Brasilia sim that I flew in 1996-97 was extremely realistic, but the visuals only showed night-time scenarios. Needless to say, my first several day landings were…interesting. But the sounds of the engines, the bounce of the tires on the lights, the incredible amount of leg effort to handle a V1 cut were all spot-on accurate. I’d come out of a day of V1 cuts with my legs just shaking.

The CRJ sim that I use now has both daylight and night capability (twilight is most realistic), and every part in the sim (save a few) could be put in the airplane–and vice versa. The visuals are much more realistic, including the depictions of other aircraft, the ramps and terminals, even fire trucks.

Like the Link trainers, the modern sim is primarily a procedures trainer. Unlike the Link, it is specific to the airplane, and it can be—and is—used to teach basic, everyday operations as well as a slew of emergencies. In airline or corporate flying, it is assumed that you can already fly IFR proficiently, so the normal procedure training concentrates on the specific way in which your company operates the aircraft, using company flows, checklists, protocols, et cetera. Further, each company will outfit the sim so that it looks like their own cockpits. While a CRJ is a CRJ and a 737 is a 737, there are some differences in avionics (or in avionic locations), displays (especially on screens, which can be programmed in a multitude of ways), and even in the style of seats. Realism counts, especially if the operator is seeking FAA approval to do initial type rides in the sim without ever making the student get in the airplane.

Sims are popular for three reasons. First, it is safer to learn in the sim than in the airplane. If you crash a sim, it’s no harm, no foul (and at some point, you will crash). Second, it’s cheaper than doing it in the airplane. You aren’t burning fuel or wasting time on the ground waiting for takeoff or vectors to final. You also aren’t putting wear and tear on the bird, and cycles are minimized. Finally, the sim is efficient. The instructor can immediately flight-freeze the sim and start a discussion. He can also back the sim up to any given point and start a maneuver again. No go-arounds are required. Weather possibilities are endless. You can practiced all manner of crosswind takeoffs and landings, and choose from among dozens of windshear models to fly, some of which are designed to make you crash. In an airplane, you simply cannot replicate malfunctions and emergencies safely. In the sim, you can throw whatever you want at the students, and if they work it correctly, great. If they make it worse, the instructor can smile sadistically as the crew tries to go from worse to bad before working on getting on up to good.

Sims and sim technology steadily improve as computing power improves, and the flying qualities are improved as more data is collected and added. As realistic as sims are, they do not fly “exactly” like an airplane, especially on landings. But they are awfully close, and they are tremendous tools for teaching and learning. If you have never been in a full motion sim, and the opportunity presents itself, jump on it!–Chip Wright

Takeoff Considerations

Tuesday, September 20th, 2011

You pull on to the runway, straighten up the nose wheel, add power, and accelerate down the runway toward another fun-filled day or night in the sky. I have no doubt you were watching the centerline to stay on track. You probably took a glance at the airspeed indicator a time or two before rotation. As you rotated, you fall into a natural pitch attitude that is by now second-nature.

Are you missing something?

Perhaps you are. Consider that between the ground and, say, 500 feet is the worst possible place to have a major engine problem. Or even a minor one. If you aren’t already in the habit, start paying attention to how much runway is left as you rotate, or if it works better for you, how much you have used. Are you 100 percent confident you will be able to stop on the remaining runway if necessary? On a long runway, the answer is most likely yes. But, what if the runway is fewer than 4,000 feet? Or fewer than 3,000 feet? Sometimes you have to acknowledge that you may not be able to stop once you reach a certain point. Then what do you do?

As you rotate, you should immediately know where you will go if you have a total power loss between the runway and 500 feet AGL, and again between 500 and 1000 feet AGL. Back on the runway, you should also be mentally prepared for the possibility of wildlife running out on the runway. There really isn’t a lot of guidance on how to handle this, as it isn’t something manufacturers test for. Obviously, if you can safely get airborne, you should. If you realize that you can’t, close the throttle immediately, and do whatever you need to keep control of the aircraft. It’s important to realize that this is not your car; damage will likely be far more extensive even at lower speeds. But hitting a deer is always more preferable to stalling because you weren’t ready to get airborne.

Taking off is more than just getting airborne. It requires consideration for a host of possibilities that you need to be prepared for. Some of the planning and information can come from the POH; the rest of it must come from common sense and the ability to think outside the box.

What are some of your takeoff considerations? Do you brief? How does the briefing go?

–Chip Wright

Airplane noises and the messages they send

Tuesday, August 23rd, 2011

Flying is a very sensory activity. In fact, at times, it can lead to sensory overload, especially in the beginning. But over time, you begin to learn what things are supposed to look like and how a few things are supposed to feel.

The view of the runway during a landing, for example, is probably one of the most difficult things to learn because it all happens so fast, and no two attempts to land are ever the same. That is, in fact, what makes teaching the art of landing so challenging as an instructor.

As for feel, you develop that as well. Think of the effort you need to put into flying a steep turn, or the mushiness of the controls that develops as you approach a stall. You learn to feel not just normal control force tension, but also deviations from the norm. It’s all part of the learning curve.

But how much do you pay attention to the sounds around you? The sounds of aviation—both normal and not-so-normal—are something you pick up on with experience as well, though you may not realize it at first. When I was teaching full time, I tended to put a lot of emphasis on listening to what was happening around us. For example, the engine makes varying levels of normal sounds throughout its operation: idle, during the runup, full power operations, cruise, et cetera. Each should sound a certain way. Even the mag check has a proper “normal” sound.

During flight, you probably subconsciously use the sound of the slipstream around the airplane to give you hints. It gets quiet when you are slow, loud when you are descending, and it changes in pitch when you extend flaps. In fact, the flap motor has a normal sound as well.

As you experience more complex aircraft, all the noises actually become even more important. On the Embraer Brasilia, the 30-passenger turboprop, there was a certain rhythm to extending the gear and adjusting the propellers. It had to sound a certain way, or something was wrong. On the CRJ, I once called for the first officer to extend the gear. The gear extension on the CRJ has a definite sound and normal sequence of events that all starts with opening of the nosewheel doors. On this occasion, there was a very abnormal thunk instead. I immediately said—well, I can’t type what I said—and the FO asked what was wrong.

“Just wait,” I said. That was immediately followed by the warning telling us that the gear was unsafe. Within seconds, the problem had resolved itself, and the gear was properly extended. But it was my experience that let me know that we would have at least an indication of a problem before that indication every showed up. Fortunately, it was all a non-event.

On another occasion, I walked on to an airplane parked at the gate. When I went to power it up, the normal sequence of clicks, clacks, groans, and avionic cooling fans coming on was replaced by what sounded like R2-D2 getting tasered. It turned out to be a faulty ground power unit. Again, it was the change in normal sounds that caught my attention first.

While your sight and feel can tell you much about your bird, pay attention to the hints that it is giving you by way of your ears. Chances are that if it sounds different, something is indeed different, and that should give you pause. But as always, fly the airplane first!

–Chip Wright

How we get the photos

Monday, August 15th, 2011

Although many readers of aviation magazines such as AOPA Pilot probably have a vague idea at this point what it takes to get a picture like the one below, chances are that as a new student the concept is fairly foreign. But it’s good to know because there are lessons in it that pertain to everyone.

Mooney Acclaim Type S

Here’s how it works: Prior to the flight, the photographer, platform airplane pilot (we’ll call it lead), and subject airplane pilot brief what’s going to happen. They talk about frequencies, aircraft speed, plan for the shoot, and safety and emergency procedures. Therein lies the first lesson. Even if you’re not flying formation, it’s a good idea to mentally go over what’s going to happen on your flight, and review your planning before you get in the airplane. Many people also brief similar to this just before take off. Items may include expected speeds, when to abort the takeoff, and so on.

(more…)

Flight instructor pay

Wednesday, July 20th, 2011

As part of AOPA’s Flight Training Retention Initiative, the association and researchers looked at the idea of what constitutes a great flight training experience. Not surprisingly, many people who were surveyed felt like they were treated less than fairly by their flight instructor or flight school. The sentiment is common for a variety of reasons, but chief among them is value. There are many aspects of the value equation, to use the executive cliche du jour, but one of the most misunderstood is instructor billing and pay.

Chances are your school charges somewhere between $30 and $60 an hour for the flight instructor’s time. There are certainly places that charge more, but they are exceptions. Again, using averages, your instructor probably only sees about half of that amount. Where things start to go crazy is in how instructors bill time. There are two common scenarios. Either the student is billed for the entire time he has booked the instructor, say two hours, or time is billed for active instruction time. Even here there are variations. Some instructors bill for time the student is preflighting. The justification is that he is supervising.

So what’s fair? My billing preference was always to charge for only that time I actually spent with a student. So if the lesson was booked for two hours, but he or she had soloed, I would bill only for the briefing, debriefing, and flight. With a presolo student, I was actively shadowing the preflight, so I would bill for that as well. While I think that is fair for the student, it often meant being at the airport for eight hours and only getting paid for about six. Such is the life of a CFI working as an independent contractor.

Even though I didn’t make as much, I never billed for the full two-hour block. And here’s why: I think it’s robbery. Charging a student for two hours of instruction, but only providing an hour and a half just isn’t ethical, as far as I’m concerned. The rationale often given for this practice is that the student has blocked the full two hours, so he or she should be charged for the full two hours. Except in the majority of cases, the CFI is making money on two students at once, or making money while sipping coffee and gossiping with other instructors. It’s like paying $10 for a sandwich and only getting two-thirds of it.

None of this takes away from the fact that I think instructors are underpaid. But to make up that money by charging a student while he or she preflights is just not the way to do it. Flight instructors: If your services are worth more, charge more. And students: If a flight instructor does this, don’t just up and leave. Have a conversation about it. And remember, 10 minutes here and there means nothing if the instructor is doing good work.

–Ian Twombly