Posts Tagged ‘Sikorsky’

Help out the kids at U. of Md.

Thursday, November 29th, 2012

Want to bet on a sure thing? The kids at the University of Maryland that built Gamera II, a human-powered helicopter, have a chance to win $10,000 to defray expenses on their next attempt at the Sikorsky challenge in 2013. They challenge requires them to reach 10 feet during a one-minute flight and remain in a 10-meter area. Watch this video and vote for it so that they win the prize. Before investing your two minutes, here’s an incentive. They have already reached nearly 10 feet in altitude and have exceeded the one-minute requirement during earlier flights. They are a sure bet to do it in 2013 and you can say you helped. They crashed a couple of times and could use the money. Give’em a break. They’re just kids. Gotta help the next generation. Stuff like that.

Quick roundup on Hawker, Eclipse, Sikorsky

Saturday, May 12th, 2012


Hawker Beechcraft issued layoff notices to another 150 people yesterday, in addition to the 350 laid off three weeks ago. The Wichita Eagle reports that leaves levels in Wichita at 4,200. If it lays off a few hundred more the company will have to return tens of millions in financial aid gained from state and local governments.

Second issue: Is there confusion at United Technologies about the role that United Technologies is playing in the restart of Eclipse production? United Technologies Chief Financial Officer Greg Hays triggered the controversy during a phone call to financial analysts in April. United Technologies is the parent company of Sikorsky and Sikorsky owns aircraft manufacturer PZL Mielic in Poland.

Here’s Hays’ quote in answer to a question from stock analyst Howard Rubel of Jefferies & Company, who wanted to know why United Technologies is selling Rocketdyne but investing in Eclipse:

“Can I make it very clear we’re not going to invest any more money in Eclipse? We did make a small investment–less than $25 million–in Eclipse, really to service the aftermarket of the aircraft. I think there’s about 300 of those airplanes that have been delivered [incorrect–the actual number is 265]. But you know, we are not in the light jet business if you will. We’re in the aftermarket business supporting the planes that are out there, but we’re not in the manufacturing business for light jets. So, again, if we haven’t made that clear before…” He then asked Rubel if that was clear, and Rubel said, “Crystal.”

Very confusing, because Eclipse officials just signed a contract to build the jet with PZL Mielic that Sikorsky bought in March of 2007. So no, United Technologies does not build business jets, but Sikorsky’s subsidiary does. PZL makes the M-28 Skytruck in the King Air class of aircraft, but more importantly makes the S-70i Blackhawk. That’s the model that proves to the world that PZL is a first-class manufacturing facility, since nearly everyone in the world has heard of it. The United Technologies/Sikorsky/Eclipse will be well built.

Eclipse production to be aided by Sikorsky

Monday, March 7th, 2011

Somehow I missed a few things in the announcement last year that Sikorsky has become a partner with Eclipse. I took that to mean Sikorsky, where company President Jeffrey P. Pino is also an Eclipse owner, is one heck of a cheerleader. Sure, they sent some money along, but mostly they would lend expertise, a worldwide parts supply network, and advice. Now that I have heard Pino speak about Eclipse at the Helicopter Association International convention in Orlando today, I have a different impression. When the economy is right, there will definitely be a resumption of Eclipse production, and that’s not necessarily news. But here is the new angle. Sikorsky will be the contractor to build the jet. It may simply direct things at the Eclipse Aerospace facility in Albuquerque, or it may also use Sikorsky facilities somewhere in the country. There may be an indication by the end of the year that the economy is on the mend, and that would mean a go-ahead for the Eclipse. Where did I get that impression? Pino mentioned, in response to a question, that the Eclipse could give Sikorsky a “chance to do something besides vertical lift.” Looking at it from a big company’s perspective, when you buy into Eclipse production, you are gaining that advantage of $700 million to $1.4 billion in effort and research and development that has already occurred in the past. That’s my reasoning, and why I will be monitoring Eclipse Aerospace very carefully in 2011.