<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Europe hates GA, apparently</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464</link>
	<description>Online perspective from the editors of "AOPA Pilot".</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomas Vega</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464&#038;cpage=1#comment-97661</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomas Vega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464#comment-97661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Europe {almost bankrupt} Union proposes such measures isn&#039;t it time perhaps
that GA as well as Americans in General pay closer attention to helping out poorer Nations such as Latin America and our nearest neighbors across the boarder and forget about trying to cross the pond in that direction. Its over rated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Europe {almost bankrupt} Union proposes such measures isn&#8217;t it time perhaps<br />
that GA as well as Americans in General pay closer attention to helping out poorer Nations such as Latin America and our nearest neighbors across the boarder and forget about trying to cross the pond in that direction. Its over rated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464&#038;cpage=1#comment-97368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464#comment-97368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first reaction was &quot;Yeah, if they do that to us, Lets do it to them&quot; - -  not a very productive attitude. Our flying system and it&#039;s cost recovery method allows access by  most Americans, effectivly promotes safety and creates a positive environment for training of a large pilot pool, concepts we have been promoting in defense of the present method of financing the FAA.  Adopting Europe&#039;s proposed rules in retaliation is only opening the door for such nonsense to be appl;ied to us by the regulation fanatics we have been keeping at bay with so much effort. If the least amount of  necessary regulation is correct for american pilots in the U.S. it would hold as a valid premise for all pilots operating in the U.S. If we can export the good things about America, namely freedom, so much the better]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first reaction was &#8220;Yeah, if they do that to us, Lets do it to them&#8221; &#8211; -  not a very productive attitude. Our flying system and it&#8217;s cost recovery method allows access by  most Americans, effectivly promotes safety and creates a positive environment for training of a large pilot pool, concepts we have been promoting in defense of the present method of financing the FAA.  Adopting Europe&#8217;s proposed rules in retaliation is only opening the door for such nonsense to be appl;ied to us by the regulation fanatics we have been keeping at bay with so much effort. If the least amount of  necessary regulation is correct for american pilots in the U.S. it would hold as a valid premise for all pilots operating in the U.S. If we can export the good things about America, namely freedom, so much the better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul T. O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464&#038;cpage=1#comment-97351</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul T. O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464#comment-97351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a Brit living here permanently in the US I will agree - BUT! I will say this, the &quot;Kings and Queen&#039;s&quot; statement is inaccurate - it is the European Parliament and the European Union that are the issue, not the vastly eroded &quot;aristocracy&quot;. The Bureaucratic machine that is the EU is a gravy train for the officials and is, yes all about fees!

Asides from a slightly xenophobic remark, I think this is a worthy article and something which needs more publication. Because yes GA suffers in Europe - I have a friend who is commercial pilot rated for the UK and did all his training in the US - Why? Because it was cheaper and the infrastructure is there, numerous planes available and many airports. He once said to me  &quot;in the UK, small airports with minimal airspace and regulatory restrictions do not exist&quot; - it is all about money. GA has just been lucky in the US that it has been allowed to flourish.

One thing is for sure, I certainly do not see things getting better in the US either... with the constant argument for user fees, avgas prices rising and the cost of training tripling since the beginning of the 21st century. We now live in an age where learning to fly is no longer a choice for many, but a privilege for the few.

Paul T. O&#039;Leary]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Brit living here permanently in the US I will agree &#8211; BUT! I will say this, the &#8220;Kings and Queen&#8217;s&#8221; statement is inaccurate &#8211; it is the European Parliament and the European Union that are the issue, not the vastly eroded &#8220;aristocracy&#8221;. The Bureaucratic machine that is the EU is a gravy train for the officials and is, yes all about fees!</p>
<p>Asides from a slightly xenophobic remark, I think this is a worthy article and something which needs more publication. Because yes GA suffers in Europe &#8211; I have a friend who is commercial pilot rated for the UK and did all his training in the US &#8211; Why? Because it was cheaper and the infrastructure is there, numerous planes available and many airports. He once said to me  &#8220;in the UK, small airports with minimal airspace and regulatory restrictions do not exist&#8221; &#8211; it is all about money. GA has just been lucky in the US that it has been allowed to flourish.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure, I certainly do not see things getting better in the US either&#8230; with the constant argument for user fees, avgas prices rising and the cost of training tripling since the beginning of the 21st century. We now live in an age where learning to fly is no longer a choice for many, but a privilege for the few.</p>
<p>Paul T. O&#8217;Leary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Brill</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464&#038;cpage=1#comment-97305</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Brill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 07:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464#comment-97305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron,

It’s a common attitude here in Europe to judge legislation by it’s intend, and not by it’s measured outcome. The fact of the matter is, that, if this goes through:

1. A number of people will quit GA
2. A number of people will return to flying VFR only because they held US-IFR ratings
3. The number of GA-airplanes in Europe will drop
4. Foreigners owning airplanes will stay well clear of the EU
5. The desired validation of EU-licenses such as the MPL by the FAA will be off the table

So clearly, there is something in it for everybody!

best regards,
Jan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,</p>
<p>It’s a common attitude here in Europe to judge legislation by it’s intend, and not by it’s measured outcome. The fact of the matter is, that, if this goes through:</p>
<p>1. A number of people will quit GA<br />
2. A number of people will return to flying VFR only because they held US-IFR ratings<br />
3. The number of GA-airplanes in Europe will drop<br />
4. Foreigners owning airplanes will stay well clear of the EU<br />
5. The desired validation of EU-licenses such as the MPL by the FAA will be off the table</p>
<p>So clearly, there is something in it for everybody!</p>
<p>best regards,<br />
Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Michaels</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464&#038;cpage=1#comment-97302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Michaels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464#comment-97302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a frequent GA pilot in Europe, I am not happy to hear about these proposed rules. But I find it silly that we think we have any reason to complain. Yes it is bad that Europe will be stifling GA. But I always thought it was amazing that a pilot with a US license or N-number airplane could fly so easily (and cheaply). 

It makes sense to me that a nation (or group of nations) would want to have something licensed (and taxed) in their own nation(s). 

It was George W. Bush that wanted to put an end to Swiss banking secrecy after 9/11 forcing many Americans who enjoyed the financial banking advantages of having their money in Switzerland to instead transfer their money somewhere else. But I don&#039;t remember people complaining that Bush &quot;hates banking&quot; even though he took away the advantages many Americans enjoy by doing their banking in the mountain nation. 

Imagine a world where pilots could save massive amounts by registering their aircraft and getting their license in Mexico. I&#039;m guessing there would be a massive uproar if 50% of all of the airplanes in the US had Mexican registration. 

Or am I wrong? Would all of the patriotic pilots happily go to Mexico to train and register their aircraft to save some taxes? Perhaps they would. 

I am happy that IAOPA and AOPA are working hard to prevent these new rules from taking effect. But honestly, it doesn&#039;t surprise me at all that Europe wants to have pilots and airplanes trained and registered as Europeans.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a frequent GA pilot in Europe, I am not happy to hear about these proposed rules. But I find it silly that we think we have any reason to complain. Yes it is bad that Europe will be stifling GA. But I always thought it was amazing that a pilot with a US license or N-number airplane could fly so easily (and cheaply). </p>
<p>It makes sense to me that a nation (or group of nations) would want to have something licensed (and taxed) in their own nation(s). </p>
<p>It was George W. Bush that wanted to put an end to Swiss banking secrecy after 9/11 forcing many Americans who enjoyed the financial banking advantages of having their money in Switzerland to instead transfer their money somewhere else. But I don&#8217;t remember people complaining that Bush &#8220;hates banking&#8221; even though he took away the advantages many Americans enjoy by doing their banking in the mountain nation. </p>
<p>Imagine a world where pilots could save massive amounts by registering their aircraft and getting their license in Mexico. I&#8217;m guessing there would be a massive uproar if 50% of all of the airplanes in the US had Mexican registration. </p>
<p>Or am I wrong? Would all of the patriotic pilots happily go to Mexico to train and register their aircraft to save some taxes? Perhaps they would. </p>
<p>I am happy that IAOPA and AOPA are working hard to prevent these new rules from taking effect. But honestly, it doesn&#8217;t surprise me at all that Europe wants to have pilots and airplanes trained and registered as Europeans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Evans</title>
		<link>http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464&#038;cpage=1#comment-97292</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aopa.org/blog/?p=1464#comment-97292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would seem that the Europeans have gone completely nuts.  The last nutty idea is the multi-pilot license, so that solo or captains won&#039;t exist.   The new rules JAA proposes that would put faa pilots and N aircraft out of &quot;European&quot; airspace needs to not only be addressed, but the US Congress needs to make it very very clear that if such rules are enacted then there will be similar punnishments to Europeans trying to license in the states, and even airline pilots with J
AA Cert should simply be barred from US airspace.  It looks as if Europe wants to start a trade war.  Where does ICAO stand on this issue, it would seem that this would violate the spirit of international cooperation.   I flew a few years ago in Cyprus, and the Chief Pilot said that doing the  JAA courses and relicensing would be a waste of time.  He said he had done it after learning to fly the US and earning his Commercial, Multi Engine, and Instructors ratings, but explained that even JAA written exams had been made so hard that they were unattainable to all except those that could spend about two years in a formal school.  The rules in Europe are arcane and out of touch with reality, to tell the truth.  
Let&#039;s hope, at this point in history, when it is so expensive to attain European flying licenses, that the US Government will strongly support the finest aviation training system in the world and make Europe understand that these punitive and foolish actions will be met head on that we will virtually bar European Airlines from our Airspace.  I would encourage everyone to join in and lobby congress and support AOPA in the attempt to stop this foolishness in its tracks.  
Doug Evans, ATP, CFI, II, MEI ASEL, AMEL,   BA, MA ED]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would seem that the Europeans have gone completely nuts.  The last nutty idea is the multi-pilot license, so that solo or captains won&#8217;t exist.   The new rules JAA proposes that would put faa pilots and N aircraft out of &#8220;European&#8221; airspace needs to not only be addressed, but the US Congress needs to make it very very clear that if such rules are enacted then there will be similar punnishments to Europeans trying to license in the states, and even airline pilots with J<br />
AA Cert should simply be barred from US airspace.  It looks as if Europe wants to start a trade war.  Where does ICAO stand on this issue, it would seem that this would violate the spirit of international cooperation.   I flew a few years ago in Cyprus, and the Chief Pilot said that doing the  JAA courses and relicensing would be a waste of time.  He said he had done it after learning to fly the US and earning his Commercial, Multi Engine, and Instructors ratings, but explained that even JAA written exams had been made so hard that they were unattainable to all except those that could spend about two years in a formal school.  The rules in Europe are arcane and out of touch with reality, to tell the truth.<br />
Let&#8217;s hope, at this point in history, when it is so expensive to attain European flying licenses, that the US Government will strongly support the finest aviation training system in the world and make Europe understand that these punitive and foolish actions will be met head on that we will virtually bar European Airlines from our Airspace.  I would encourage everyone to join in and lobby congress and support AOPA in the attempt to stop this foolishness in its tracks.<br />
Doug Evans, ATP, CFI, II, MEI ASEL, AMEL,   BA, MA ED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
